Hi,
does it make a sense to keep the function (or is it to avoid the
header inclusion)? What about using the macro directly ?
Pavel
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 09:12 +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> server/red-channel.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/server/red-channel.c b/server/red-channel.c
> index 927e6e9..27c8632 100644
> --- a/server/red-channel.c
> +++ b/server/red-channel.c
> @@ -331,12 +331,7 @@ void red_channel_register_client_cbs(RedChannel
> *channel, const ClientCbs *clien
>
> int test_capability(const uint32_t *caps, int num_caps, uint32_t
> cap)
> {
> - uint32_t index = cap / 32;
> - if (num_caps < index + 1) {
> - return FALSE;
> - }
> -
> - return (caps[index] & (1 << (cap % 32))) != 0;
> + return VD_AGENT_HAS_CAPABILITY(caps, num_caps, cap);
> }
>
> static void add_capability(uint32_t **caps, int *num_caps, uint32_t
> cap)
>
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel