Re: [PATCH v2] Small comment on structure checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 09:55 +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  server/display-channel.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - improved comment
> 
> diff --git a/server/display-channel.c b/server/display-channel.c
> index 8b949a2..a85c091 100644
> --- a/server/display-channel.c
> +++ b/server/display-channel.c
> @@ -1985,6 +1985,8 @@ void
> display_channel_process_surface_cmd(DisplayChannel *display,
> RedSurfaceCmd
>          }
>          data = surface->u.surface_create.data;
>          if (stride < 0) {
> +            /* no worry for overflow here, command should already be
> validated
> +             * when is readed, specifically red_get_surface_cmd */
>              data -= (int32_t)(stride * (height - 1));
>          }
>          display_channel_create_surface(display, surface_id, surface-
> >u.surface_create.width,


OK, but slight re-wording:

"No need to worry about overflow..."
"...when it is read, ..."

Acked-by: Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]