Re: [spice-server v2 1/2] mcc: early return and lower indentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 09:52 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > 
> > ---
> >  server/main-channel-client.c | 94
> >  ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/server/main-channel-client.c b/server/main-channel-
> > client.c
> > index 12151a7..4f44c38 100644
> > --- a/server/main-channel-client.c
> > +++ b/server/main-channel-client.c
> > @@ -376,59 +376,59 @@ void
> > main_channel_client_handle_pong(MainChannelClient
> > *mcc, SpiceMsgPing *ping,
> >  
> >      roundtrip = g_get_monotonic_time() - ping->timestamp;
> >  
> > -    if (ping->id == mcc->net_test_id) {
> > -        switch (mcc->net_test_stage) {
> > -            case NET_TEST_STAGE_WARMUP:
> > -                mcc->net_test_id++;
> > -                mcc->net_test_stage = NET_TEST_STAGE_LATENCY;
> > -                mcc->latency = roundtrip;
> > -                break;
> > -            case NET_TEST_STAGE_LATENCY:
> > -                mcc->net_test_id++;
> > -                mcc->net_test_stage = NET_TEST_STAGE_RATE;
> > -                mcc->latency = MIN(mcc->latency, roundtrip);
> > -                break;
> > -            case NET_TEST_STAGE_RATE:
> > -                mcc->net_test_id = 0;
> > -                if (roundtrip <= mcc->latency) {
> > -                    // probably high load on client or server
> > result with
> > incorrect values
> > -                    spice_printerr("net test: invalid values,
> > latency %"
> > PRIu64
> > -                                   " roundtrip %" PRIu64 ".
> > assuming high"
> > -                                   "bandwidth", mcc->latency,
> > roundtrip);
> > -                    mcc->latency = 0;
> > -                    mcc->net_test_stage = NET_TEST_STAGE_INVALID;
> > -
> > red_channel_client_start_connectivity_monitoring(&mcc->base,
> > -
> > CLIENT_CONNECTIVITY_TIMEOUT);
> > -                    break;
> > -                }
> > -                mcc->bitrate_per_sec = (uint64_t)(NET_TEST_BYTES *
> > 8) *
> > 1000000
> > -                    / (roundtrip - mcc->latency);
> > -                mcc->net_test_stage = NET_TEST_STAGE_COMPLETE;
> > -                spice_printerr("net test: latency %f ms, bitrate
> > %"PRIu64"
> > bps (%f Mbps)%s",
> > -                               (double)mcc->latency / 1000,
> > -                               mcc->bitrate_per_sec,
> > -                               (double)mcc->bitrate_per_sec / 1024
> > / 1024,
> > -                               main_channel_client_is_low_bandwidt
> > h(mcc) ? "
> > LOW BANDWIDTH" : "");
> > -                red_channel_client_start_connectivity_monitoring(&
> > mcc->base,
> > -
> > CLIENT_CONNECTIVITY_TIMEOUT);
> > -                break;
> > -            default:
> > -                spice_printerr("invalid net test stage, ping id %d
> > test id
> > %d stage %d",
> > -                               ping->id,
> > -                               mcc->net_test_id,
> > -                               mcc->net_test_stage);
> > -                mcc->net_test_stage = NET_TEST_STAGE_INVALID;
> > -        }
> > -        return;
> > -    } else {
> > +    if (ping->id != mcc->net_test_id) {
> >          /*
> >           * channel client monitors the connectivity using ping-
> > pong messages
> >           */
> >          red_channel_client_handle_message(rcc, size,
> > SPICE_MSGC_PONG, ping);
> > -    }
> >  #ifdef RED_STATISTICS
> > -    stat_update_value(red_channel_client_get_channel(rcc)->reds,
> > roundtrip);
> > +        stat_update_value(red_channel_client_get_channel(rcc)-
> > >reds,
> > roundtrip);
> >  #endif
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    switch (mcc->net_test_stage) {
> > +    case NET_TEST_STAGE_WARMUP:
> > +        mcc->net_test_id++;
> > +        mcc->net_test_stage = NET_TEST_STAGE_LATENCY;
> > +        mcc->latency = roundtrip;
> > +        break;
> > +    case NET_TEST_STAGE_LATENCY:
> > +        mcc->net_test_id++;
> > +        mcc->net_test_stage = NET_TEST_STAGE_RATE;
> > +        mcc->latency = MIN(mcc->latency, roundtrip);
> > +        break;
> > +    case NET_TEST_STAGE_RATE:
> > +        mcc->net_test_id = 0;
> > +        if (roundtrip <= mcc->latency) {
> > +            // probably high load on client or server result with
> > incorrect
> > values
> > +            spice_printerr("net test: invalid values, latency %"
> > PRIu64
> > +                           " roundtrip %" PRIu64 ". assuming high"
> > +                           "bandwidth", mcc->latency, roundtrip);
> > +            mcc->latency = 0;
> > +            mcc->net_test_stage = NET_TEST_STAGE_INVALID;
> > +            red_channel_client_start_connectivity_monitoring(&mcc-
> > >base,
> > +
> > CLIENT_CONNECTIVITY_TIMEOUT);
> > +            break;
> > +        }
> > +        mcc->bitrate_per_sec = (uint64_t)(NET_TEST_BYTES * 8) *
> > 1000000
> > +            / (roundtrip - mcc->latency);
> > +        mcc->net_test_stage = NET_TEST_STAGE_COMPLETE;
> > +        spice_printerr("net test: latency %f ms, bitrate %"PRIu64"
> > bps (%f
> > Mbps)%s",
> > +                       (double)mcc->latency / 1000,
> > +                       mcc->bitrate_per_sec,
> > +                       (double)mcc->bitrate_per_sec / 1024 / 1024,
> > +                       main_channel_client_is_low_bandwidth(mcc) ?
> > " LOW
> > BANDWIDTH" : "");
> > +        red_channel_client_start_connectivity_monitoring(&mcc-
> > >base,
> > +
> > CLIENT_CONNECTIVITY_TIMEOUT);
> > +        break;
> > +    default:
> > +        spice_printerr("invalid net test stage, ping id %d test id
> > %d stage
> > %d",
> > +                       ping->id,
> > +                       mcc->net_test_id,
> > +                       mcc->net_test_stage);
> > +        mcc->net_test_stage = NET_TEST_STAGE_INVALID;
> > +    }
> >  }
> >  
> >  void main_channel_client_handle_migrate_end(MainChannelClient
> > *mcc)
> 
> Acked-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Jonathon, do you think would be better to merge some patches from
> refactory before?
> 
> Frediano



I think this could go in now if you want. It's not so big that it
should create much problem for rebasing. 


_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]