Hi, El mié, 03-08-2016 a las 04:57 -0400, Frediano Ziglio escribió: > > > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:35:56AM +0300, Sameeh Jubran wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We've already looked into those patches (Javier's patches) and > > > tested them. > > > > Ah ok, I must have missed your answer to Javier's series. > > > > > We found that on the contrary to our patches, > > > multi-monitor support and arbitrary resolution do not work with > > > the patches > > > posted by Javier. Even though arbitrary resolution > > > resolution is implemented in Javier's patches, it is not fully > > > arbitrary. And full arbitrary resolution would be too complicated to add on top of Javier's series, hence the decision to go with an entirely different series? Sorry for the basic questions, I'm really not familiar with Windows API :) Christophe Not at all. I did not implement multi-monitor support because that required to break the interface with the last kernel driver version at that moment (it only supported one operation, setting an arbitrary resolution). So it is only a matter of writing the new escapes. On the other hand, I limited arbitrary resolutions to even sizes because, again, that was what the kernel driver was doing at that moment. That restriction is gone now, so my code can be adjusted to really arbitrary resolutions. One good thing about Javier's patches, they were small. The current patch is too big and should be split. Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel