On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 12:26:24AM +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> The xfer-task reference given by hash table belongs to the caller so
"stored in the hash table returned by
spice_file_transfer_task_create_tasks"
> we need to release it. Releasing on "finish" callback the same way
> channel-main does but is possible to do on teardown function too.
"This commit releases it in the "finish" callback ... but it is possible
to do it in the teardown function too"
Not directly related to this commit, but are there places in the code
that rely on removing an item from the hash table and expecting to own
a ref on that item? I could not find such a place. In other words, I
don't understand why the g_object_unref() is not passed as a parameter
to g_hash_table_new_full().
Reviewed-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Christophe
> ---
> tests/file-transfer.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/file-transfer.c b/tests/file-transfer.c
> index a27b9cf..bf959ac 100644
> --- a/tests/file-transfer.c
> +++ b/tests/file-transfer.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ transfer_xfer_task_on_finished(SpiceFileTransferTask *xfer_task,
> {
> Fixture *f = user_data;
>
> + if (xfer_task != NULL) {
> + guint32 task_id = spice_file_transfer_task_get_id(xfer_task);
> + g_hash_table_remove(f->xfer_tasks, GUINT_TO_POINTER(task_id));
> + g_object_unref(xfer_task);
> + }
> +
> f->num_files_done++;
> if (f->num_files == f->num_files_done)
> g_main_loop_quit(f->loop);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel