Re: [vdagent-linux v1] systemd-login: check for LockedHint property

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 09:44 +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:43:25PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 11:42 +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> > > Property introduced in v230 of systemd.
> > > 
> > > Systems that don't have up to date systemd-login will get the
> > > following log message:
> > > 
> > > "Properties.Get failed: Unknown property or interface."
> > Can we give more info (which property is unknown) ? To make it easier for
> > users.
> > The property is new, so almost everyone will see the message in the log.
> 
> Right, I hard-coded '(locked-hint)' string in the error message as the
> message comes from dbus-1. I hope we can get better error messages when
> using gdbus in the future.
thanks
> 
> > > 
> > > Resolves: rhbz#1323623
> > > ---
> > >  src/systemd-login.c | 102
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > -
> > >  1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/src/systemd-login.c b/src/systemd-login.c
> > > index 730547a..c56fca4 100644
> > > --- a/src/systemd-login.c
> > > +++ b/src/systemd-login.c
> > > @@ -36,14 +36,21 @@ struct session_info {
> > >          char *match_session_signals;
> > >      } dbus;
> > >      gboolean session_is_locked;
> > > +    gboolean session_locked_hint;
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +#define LOGIND_INTERFACE            "org.freedesktop.login1"
> > > +
> > >  #define LOGIND_SESSION_INTERFACE    "org.freedesktop.login1.Session"
> > >  #define LOGIND_SESSION_OBJ_TEMPLATE
> > > "/org/freedesktop/login1/session/_3%s"
> > >  
> > > +#define DBUS_PROPERTIES_INTERFACE   "org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties"
> > > +
> > >  #define SESSION_SIGNAL_LOCK         "Lock"
> > >  #define SESSION_SIGNAL_UNLOCK       "Unlock"
> > >  
> > > +#define SESSION_PROP_LOCKED_HINT    "LockedHint"
> > > +
> > >  /* dbus related */
> > >  static DBusConnection *si_dbus_get_system_bus(void)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -112,6 +119,84 @@ static void si_dbus_match_rule_update(struct
> > > session_info
> > > *si)
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static void
> > > +si_dbus_read_properties(struct session_info *si)
> > > +{
> > > +    dbus_bool_t locked_hint, ret;
> > > +    DBusMessageIter iter, iter_variant;
> > > +    gint type;
> > > +    DBusError error;
> > > +    DBusMessage *message = NULL;
> > > +    DBusMessage *reply = NULL;
> > > +    gchar *session_object;
> > > +    const gchar *interface, *property;
> > > +
> > > +    if (si->session == NULL)
> > > +        return;
> > > +
> > > +    session_object = g_strdup_printf(LOGIND_SESSION_OBJ_TEMPLATE, si-
> > > > session);
> > > +    message = dbus_message_new_method_call(LOGIND_INTERFACE,
> > > +                                           session_object,
> > > +                                           DBUS_PROPERTIES_INTERFACE,
> > > +                                           "Get");
> > > +    g_free (session_object);
> > > +    if (message == NULL) {
> > > +        syslog(LOG_ERR, "Unable to create dbus message");
> > > +        goto exit;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    interface = LOGIND_SESSION_INTERFACE;
> > > +    property = SESSION_PROP_LOCKED_HINT;
> > > +    ret = dbus_message_append_args(message,
> > > +                                   DBUS_TYPE_STRING, &interface,
> > > +                                   DBUS_TYPE_STRING, &property,
> > > +                                   DBUS_TYPE_INVALID);
> > > +    if (!ret) {
> > > +        syslog(LOG_ERR, "Unable to request locked-hint");
> > > +        goto exit;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    dbus_error_init(&error);
> > > +    reply = dbus_connection_send_with_reply_and_block(si-
> > > > dbus.system_connection,
> > > +                                                      message,
> > > +                                                      -1,
> > > +                                                      &error);
> > > +    if (reply == NULL || dbus_error_is_set(&error)) {
> > According to function definition error is set on failure, so this block can
> > be
> > simplified
> 
> I'm following the same approach Hans did with console-kit so I would
> rather to keep it this way till we move to gdbus. I hope that gdbus
> would improve the error handling and not let things like [0] happen for
> instance.
> 
> [0] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/linux/vd_agent/tree/src/console-kit.c#n
> 170
> 
> Also, I was taught [1] that checking the return value of the function is
> better then checking the error.

Definitely, the function returns NULL w/o setting error when validating its
parameters. But the reply cannot be nonnull and error set. I just wanted to say
that the second part of the condition is redundant: 'if (reply == NULL)' is
enough

Pavel

> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763046#c20
> 
> > > +        if (dbus_error_is_set(&error)) {
> > > +            syslog(LOG_ERR, "Properties.Get failed: %s", error.message);
> > > +            dbus_error_free(&error);
> > > +        } else {
> > > +            syslog(LOG_ERR, "Properties.Get failed");
> > > +        }
> > > +        goto exit;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    dbus_message_iter_init(reply, &iter);
> > > +    type = dbus_message_iter_get_arg_type(&iter);
> > > +    if (type != DBUS_TYPE_VARIANT) {
> > > +        syslog(LOG_ERR, "expected a variant, got a '%c' instead", type);
> > > +        goto exit;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    dbus_message_iter_recurse(&iter, &iter_variant);
> > > +    type = dbus_message_iter_get_arg_type(&iter_variant);
> > > +    if (type != DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN) {
> > > +        syslog(LOG_ERR, "expected a boolean, got a '%c' instead", type);
> > > +        goto exit;
> > > +    }
> > > +    dbus_message_iter_get_basic(&iter_variant, &locked_hint);
> > > +
> > > +    si->session_locked_hint = (locked_hint) ? TRUE : FALSE;
> > > +exit:
> > > +    if (reply != NULL) {
> > > +        dbus_message_unref(reply);
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    if (message != NULL) {
> > > +        dbus_message_unref(message);
> > > +    }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void
> > >  si_dbus_read_signals(struct session_info *si)
> > >  {
> > >      DBusMessage *message = NULL;
> > > @@ -220,16 +305,19 @@ char *session_info_session_for_pid(struct
> > > session_info
> > > *si, uint32_t pid)
> > >  
> > >  gboolean session_info_session_is_locked(struct session_info *si)
> > >  {
> > > -    g_return_val_if_fail (si != NULL, FALSE);
> > > +    gboolean locked;
> > >  
> > > -    /* We could also rely on IdleHint property from Session which seems
> > > to
> > > work
> > > -     * well in rhel7 but it wasn't working well in my own system (F23).
> > > I'm
> > > -     * convinced for now that Lock/Unlock signals should be enough but
> > > that
> > > -     * means Lock/Unlock being done by logind. That might take a while.
> > > -     * Check: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764773 */
> > > +    g_return_val_if_fail (si != NULL, FALSE);
> > >  
> > >      si_dbus_read_signals(si);
> > > -    return si->session_is_locked;
> > > +    si_dbus_read_properties(si);
> > > +
> > > +    locked = (si->session_is_locked || si->session_locked_hint);
> > > +    if (si->verbose) {
> > > +        syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "(systemd-login) session is locked: %s",
> > > +               locked ? "yes" : "no");
> > > +    }
> > > +    return locked;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  /* This function should only be called after
> > > session_info_get_active_session
> > 
> > Looks good.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Pavel
> 
> Thanks for reviewing, I'll be sending a v2 shortly.
> 
> Cheers,
>   toso
> 
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]