Hi, On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 06:44 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to have some standard on the internal documentation of spice- > server. > Yes, that would be nice. > The current situation is quite messy having different styles. > I think the worst think is not having any documentation, so better messy > than nothing. > I really like Doxygen as it's really complete tool however my Gtk-doc > knowledge > is very low and I cannot compare the two. "GTK-Doc has some special code to document the signals and properties of GTK+ widgets and GObject classes which other tools may not have." [0] But I think the same can be achieved with Doxygen. > I know we use quite a lot of "G" stuff so perhaps people feels more > comfortable > with Gtk-doc. > I'd like to see the documentation generated and possibly published on web > so suggestion from the guys who maintain the website are really welcome. Both Doxygen and gtk-doc can be used. We are using gtk-doc for spice-gtk, it is not planned to switch to something else. [0] http://www.gtk.org/gtk-doc/ Pavel > > Frediano > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel