Re: [PATCH 01/14] Add red_client_seamless_migration_done_for_channel()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 15:00 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> This is a public RedClient API that handles updating itself rather than
> having the RedChannelClient poke around at the internal structure in
> rec_channel_client_seamless_migration_done().

It looks good, I would drop the rcc parameter - it is not needed. Also later it
can become static in red channel client.

Pavel

> ---
>  server/red-channel.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/server/red-channel.c b/server/red-channel.c
> index cdd1cf0..c1e3dad 100644
> --- a/server/red-channel.c
> +++ b/server/red-channel.c
> @@ -939,23 +939,35 @@ error:
>      return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static void red_channel_client_seamless_migration_done(RedChannelClient *rcc)
> +/* returns TRUE If all channels are finished migrating, FALSE otherwise */
> +static gboolean red_client_seamless_migration_done_for_channel(RedClient
> *client,
> +                                                               RedChannelClie
> nt *rcc)
>  {
> -    RedsState *reds = red_channel_get_server(rcc->channel);
> -    rcc->wait_migrate_data = FALSE;
> -
> -    pthread_mutex_lock(&rcc->client->lock);
> -    rcc->client->num_migrated_channels--;
> +    gboolean ret = FALSE;
>  
> +    pthread_mutex_lock(&client->lock);
> +    client->num_migrated_channels--;
>      /* we assume we always have at least one channel who has migration data
> transfer,
>       * otherwise, this flag will never be set back to FALSE*/
> -    if (!rcc->client->num_migrated_channels) {
> -        rcc->client->during_target_migrate = FALSE;
> -        rcc->client->seamless_migrate = FALSE;
> +    if (!client->num_migrated_channels) {
> +        client->during_target_migrate = FALSE;
> +        client->seamless_migrate = FALSE;
>          /* migration completion might have been triggered from a different
> thread
>           * than the main thread */
> -        main_dispatcher_seamless_migrate_dst_complete(reds_get_main_dispatche
> r(reds),
> -                                                      rcc->client);
> +        main_dispatcher_seamless_migrate_dst_complete(reds_get_main_dispatche
> r(client->reds),
> +                                                      client);
> +        ret = TRUE;
> +    }
> +    pthread_mutex_unlock(&client->lock);
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void red_channel_client_seamless_migration_done(RedChannelClient *rcc)
> +{
> +    rcc->wait_migrate_data = FALSE;
> +
> +    if (red_client_seamless_migration_done_for_channel(rcc->client, rcc)) {
>          if (rcc->latency_monitor.timer) {
>              red_channel_client_start_ping_timer(rcc,
> PING_TEST_IDLE_NET_TIMEOUT_MS);
>          }
> @@ -964,7 +976,6 @@ static void
> red_channel_client_seamless_migration_done(RedChannelClient *rcc)
>                                              rcc-
> >connectivity_monitor.timeout);
>          }
>      }
> -    pthread_mutex_unlock(&rcc->client->lock);
>  }
>  
>  int red_channel_client_is_waiting_for_migrate_data(RedChannelClient *rcc)
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]