On 03/30/2016 04:57 AM, Pedro Francisco wrote: > Sending to list as well, this time. > > 2016-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Jeremy White <jwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> Hi folks, >> >> As you know, I've done a lot of work on XSpice over the past few years. >> I plan to take a new approach by following the model of the excellent >> 'x11vnc' client. > > > Tell me, performance-wise, is there any different between a real X11 > on real hardware and a X11 on XvFb or equivalent? Performance-wise, > will one be hardware-accelerated and the other software-render only? > Well, yes, there is a difference between X11 running with a video card with a GPU and X11 using the dummy driver and software rendering; the former has a GPU to accelerate draws and generally benefits from glx and opengl functionality. I'm not sure I follow the relevance to this thread, though. Both Xspice and x11spice would, by default, use an X frame buffer sort of driver. It is the case, though, that the benefit that x11spice could be run against a main session probably does mean that you'd get the benefit of the GPU acceleration of that session. Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel