Re: RFC: XSpice shift to an 'x11spice' approach

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Jeremy White wrote:
[...]

> Hi folks,
> 
> As you know, I've done a lot of work on XSpice over the past few years.
>  I plan to take a new approach by following the model of the excellent
> 'x11vnc' client.
[...]
> What do others think?  What am I over looking?

One of the big features of Spice is being able to transport the audio 
channel. However it seems like this relies on being able to set PULSE* 
variables in the environment of the processes running in the X session. 
That would not be possible when connecting to an existing X11 session. 
Would alternative mechanism be able to compensate?

Spice can also remote other resources but I don't have a sense of how 
much those would be impacted.

Also, would that mean that the Xspice script would become a wrapper for 
starting an X session and the related x11spice client?


-- 
Francois Gouget <fgouget@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]