Hi, is there any news about this project? It is very good but if I remember correctly there is a blocking license issue to solve. After that is done it can be put in spice upstream and some missing features can be merged from spice-html5. Another related thing that need addressing: https://github.com/eyeos/spice-web-client/issues/9 @Eyeos developers: Can you confirm your intention about this, please? Thanks for any reply and sorry for my bad english. Il 07/12/2015 22:05, Jeremy White ha scritto: > Hi Jose, > > I have spent a fair amount of time using this client and reviewing it, > and I've got a number of comments for you. > > There are a range of minor technical issues; you've got a hiddeninput in > your version that prevents use of a top strip of a window. Removing > that fixes that easily. Similarly, there is a graphicDebug section > which doesn't do any harm, but maybe shouldn't be on by default. > > There isn't any automatic keyboard layout, so I have to manually switch > to the US keyboard layout; others might have to create their own > keyboard layout. > > Non Spanish keyboards probably need some review; I note, for example, > that '^U' does not do what I crave (clear my terminal console). I think > I'd argue for a bias of sending all keys across, as much as possible. > > We've touched on the license issue. It sounds like you plan to resolve > that nicely, but it'd be nice to see that. To be honest, it's a little > worrying that you've been silent for a month now :-/. > > In general, your client does seem faster and bit more broadly functional > than the current one. For example, the current spice-html5 client has > an odd bug with Firefox on the Mac that yours does not have. (IE 11 > support in yours is a bit dodgy; although that's perhaps just because IE > 11 is dodgy <grin>). You've got support for a few more image formats > than the current spice-html5 client, I think particularly providing > better support for Windows guests. > > There are a range of features found in the current spice-html5 client > that you are lacking; show/hide cursor, opus audio, drag + drop file > transfer. Most of those should not be hard to implement. > > You've also got some functionality that appears to reference non Spice > related functionality. (For example, the whole 'bus' concept). That's > a bit tricky in an open source project; it'd be nice to have the open > source client be purely about Spice, and any proprietary extensions or > hooks could be done as patches, or maybe via a plugin mechanism. > > At any rate, I promised a more thoughtful review, and so here it is <grin>. > > cheers, > > Jeremy > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel