Re: [PATCH 1/2] ring: use NULL instead of 0 for null pointers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 02:24:59PM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> This is consistent with the rest of the code making clear
> fields are pointers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Victor Toso <victortoso@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  common/ring.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/ring.h b/common/ring.h
> index 7fba50e..0b2d123 100644
> --- a/common/ring.h
> +++ b/common/ring.h
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline void __ring_remove(RingItem *item)
>  {
>      item->next->prev = item->prev;
>      item->prev->next = item->next;
> -    item->prev = item->next = 0;
> +    item->prev = item->next = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void ring_remove(RingItem *item)
> -- 
> 2.4.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]