On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 07:54:07AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > This is the simplest way I could find to have a AsyncCommand in > > > > > QXLState in following patch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The following patch just update spice-common repository. > > > > This patch is referring the "following"? > > > > > > > > The reasoning looks a bit weak to me. > > > > > > Why? I just wanted to store the current gl-draw AsyncCommand in QXLState. > > > > > > > You can just use > > > > struct AsyncCommand *aync_command; > > > > like for dispatcher > > Correct, that seems to be a common practice in Spice server code. I'll > change the series to use that instead then. However, it would be nice > to consider having the common typedefs in common imho. It doesn't make > sense to me that in some header you can use "Foo" type directly and > some you don't and have to use "struct Foo". Yup, agreed. Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel