>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The check is done in draw()
> > ---
> > server/red_worker.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/server/red_worker.c b/server/red_worker.c
> > index 84048fe..2b5c162 100644
> > --- a/server/red_worker.c
> > +++ b/server/red_worker.c
> > @@ -647,10 +647,6 @@ static int red_process_commands(RedWorker *worker,
> > uint32_t max_pipe_size, int *
> > &update, ext_cmd.cmd.data)) {
> > break;
> > }
> > - if (!validate_surface(worker->display_channel,
> > update.surface_id)) {
> > - spice_warning("Invalid surface in QXL_CMD_UPDATE");
> > - break;
> > - }
> > display_channel_draw(worker->display_channel, &update.area,
> > update.surface_id);
> > worker->qxl->st->qif->notify_update(worker->qxl,
> > update.update_id);
> > release_info_ext.group_id = ext_cmd.group_id;
> > --
> > 2.4.3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spice-devel mailing list
> > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
>
> Please, someone correct-me if I am mistaken, but this check doesn't
> seem to be done in the draw(). NAK from me.
> Reviwed-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
Rejected.
There is a partial test for surface_id value.
Frediano
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel