Re: [PATCH 11/18] worker: use spice_return_if_fail() instead of spice_assert() in release_item

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 17:01 +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
>  server/red_worker.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/server/red_worker.c b/server/red_worker.c
> index 656f9ab..65d5dea 100644
> --- a/server/red_worker.c
> +++ b/server/red_worker.c
> @@ -4453,7 +4453,7 @@ static void release_item(RedChannelClient *rcc, PipeItem
> *item, int item_pushed)
>  {
>      DisplayChannelClient *dcc = RCC_TO_DCC(rcc);
>  
> -    spice_assert(item);
> +    spice_return_if_fail(item != NULL);
>      dcc_release_item(dcc, item, item_pushed);
>  }
>  

Early return seems fine here, but in order to actually return and not abort, we
should use g_return_if_fail()
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]