Re: [PATCH 03/18] worker: improve some pre-conditions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>  server/red_worker.c | 35 ++---------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/server/red_worker.c b/server/red_worker.c
> index 6e859fe..f6dfe28 100644
> --- a/server/red_worker.c
> +++ b/server/red_worker.c
> @@ -223,8 +223,8 @@ void drawable_pipe_item_unref(DrawablePipeItem *dpi)
>          return;
>      }
>
> -    spice_warn_if_fail(!ring_item_is_linked(&dpi->dpi_pipe_item.link));
> -    spice_warn_if_fail(!ring_item_is_linked(&dpi->base));
> +    spice_return_if_fail(!ring_item_is_linked(&dpi->dpi_pipe_item.link));
> +    spice_return_if_fail(!ring_item_is_linked(&dpi->base));

Again changing the spice_warn_if_fail() for spice_return_if_fail().

>      display_channel_drawable_unref(display, dpi->drawable);
>      free(dpi);
>  }
> @@ -236,33 +236,6 @@ QXLInstance* red_worker_get_qxl(RedWorker *worker)
>      return worker->qxl;
>  }
>
> -static int validate_drawable_bbox(RedWorker *worker, RedDrawable *drawable)
> -{
> -        DrawContext *context;
> -        uint32_t surface_id = drawable->surface_id;
> -
> -        /* surface_id must be validated before calling into
> -         * validate_drawable_bbox
> -         */
> -        VALIDATE_SURFACE_RETVAL(worker->display_channel, surface_id, FALSE);
> -        context = &worker->display_channel->surfaces[surface_id].context;
> -
> -        if (drawable->bbox.top < 0)
> -                return FALSE;
> -        if (drawable->bbox.left < 0)
> -                return FALSE;
> -        if (drawable->bbox.bottom < 0)
> -                return FALSE;
> -        if (drawable->bbox.right < 0)
> -                return FALSE;
> -        if (drawable->bbox.bottom > context->height)
> -                return FALSE;
> -        if (drawable->bbox.right > context->width)
> -                return FALSE;
> -
> -        return TRUE;
> -}
> -
>  static inline int validate_surface(DisplayChannel *display, uint32_t surface_id)
>  {
>      if SPICE_UNLIKELY(surface_id >= display->n_surfaces) {
> @@ -1098,10 +1071,6 @@ static Drawable *get_drawable(RedWorker *worker, uint8_t effect, RedDrawable *re
>      int x;
>
>      VALIDATE_SURFACE_RETVAL(display, red_drawable->surface_id, NULL)
> -    if (!validate_drawable_bbox(worker, red_drawable)) {
> -        rendering_incorrect(__func__);
> -        return NULL;
> -    }

I don't understand how we are improving the pre-conditions removing
the validate_drawable_bbox().

>      for (x = 0; x < 3; ++x) {
>          if (red_drawable->surface_deps[x] != -1) {
>              VALIDATE_SURFACE_RETVAL(display, red_drawable->surface_deps[x], NULL)
> --
> 2.4.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel


NACK  from me.
-- 
Fabiano Fidêncio
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]