Re: [PATCH 00/18] Backported some patches from refactory branches (18th Nov)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:50:35AM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> This patchset supersedes last patchset.
> > >>
> > >> Changes:
> > >> - rebased;
> > >> - removed merged patches;
> > >> - added some patches.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Forget, I added again some patches on assert. I think we have more clear
> > > idea.
> >
> > Do we have an agreement about the asserts?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> 
> What we have from discussion in [1] is enough?
> 

I think Uri reasoning is well accepted and is a really good cut.
And we almost agree to discuss more these changes.

> [1]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2015-November/023668.html
> 
> Also, if assert is no good, we can use the new define if it goes
> upstream [2]
> 

Yes, I'll post a last version (just space changes)

> [2]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2015-November/023835.html
> 
> Cheers,
>   - toso
> 

Frediano
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]