Re: [PATCH 18/18] worker: merge red_draw_qxl_drawable in drawable_draw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> >  server/red_worker.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/server/red_worker.c b/server/red_worker.c
> > index e31dd08..30dcbce 100644
> > --- a/server/red_worker.c
> > +++ b/server/red_worker.c
> > @@ -176,8 +176,7 @@ typedef struct BitmapData {
> >
> >  static inline int validate_surface(DisplayChannel *display, uint32_t
> >  surface_id);
> >
> > -static void red_draw_qxl_drawable(DisplayChannel *display, Drawable
> > *drawable);
> > -static void red_draw_drawable(DisplayChannel *display, Drawable *item);
> > +static void drawable_draw(DisplayChannel *display, Drawable *item);
> >  static void red_update_area(DisplayChannel *display, const SpiceRect
> >  *area, int surface_id);
> >  static void red_update_area_till(DisplayChannel *display, const SpiceRect
> >  *area, int surface_id,
> >                                   Drawable *last);
> > @@ -1139,7 +1138,7 @@ static bool free_one_drawable(DisplayChannel
> > *display, int force_glz_free)
> >              dcc_free_glz_drawable(glz->dcc, glz);
> >          }
> >      }
> > -    red_draw_drawable(display, drawable);
> > +    drawable_draw(display, drawable);
> >      container = drawable->tree_item.base.container;
> >
> >      current_remove_drawable(display, drawable);
> > @@ -1401,14 +1400,17 @@ static void image_surface_init(DisplayChannel
> > *display)
> >      display->image_surfaces.ops = &image_surfaces_ops;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void red_draw_qxl_drawable(DisplayChannel *display, Drawable
> > *drawable)
> > +static void drawable_draw(DisplayChannel *display, Drawable *drawable)
> >  {
> >      RedSurface *surface;
> >      SpiceCanvas *canvas;
> >      SpiceClip clip = drawable->red_drawable->clip;
> >
> > +    red_flush_source_surfaces(display, drawable);
> > +
> >      surface = &display->surfaces[drawable->surface_id];
> >      canvas = surface->context.canvas;
> > +    spice_return_if_fail(canvas);
> 
> Can the canvas be NULL here? If it can, does make sense to abort?
> 
> >
> >      image_cache_aging(&display->image_cache);
> >
> > @@ -1538,12 +1540,6 @@ static void red_draw_qxl_drawable(DisplayChannel
> > *display, Drawable *drawable)
> >      }
> >  }
> >
> > -static void red_draw_drawable(DisplayChannel *display, Drawable *drawable)
> > -{
> > -    red_flush_source_surfaces(display, drawable);
> > -    red_draw_qxl_drawable(display, drawable);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static void validate_area(DisplayChannel *display, const SpiceRect *area,
> >  uint32_t surface_id)
> >  {
> >      RedSurface *surface;
> > @@ -1637,12 +1633,12 @@ static void red_update_area_till(DisplayChannel
> > *display, const SpiceRect *area,
> >          container = now->tree_item.base.container;
> >          current_remove_drawable(display, now);
> >          container_cleanup(container);
> > -        /* red_draw_drawable may call red_update_area for the surfaces
> > 'now' depends on. Notice,
> > +        /* drawable_draw may call red_update_area for the surfaces 'now'
> > depends on. Notice,
> >             that it is valid to call red_update_area in this case and not
> >             red_update_area_till:
> >             It is impossible that there was newer item then 'last' in one
> >             of the surfaces
> >             that red_update_area is called for, Otherwise, 'now' would have
> >             already been rendered.
> >             See the call for red_handle_depends_on_target_surface in
> >             red_process_draw */
> > -        red_draw_drawable(display, now);
> > +        drawable_draw(display, now);
> >          display_channel_drawable_unref(display, now);
> >      } while (now != surface_last);
> >      validate_area(display, area, surface_id);
> > @@ -1695,7 +1691,7 @@ static void red_update_area(DisplayChannel *display,
> > const SpiceRect *area, int
> >          container = now->tree_item.base.container;
> >          current_remove_drawable(display, now);
> >          container_cleanup(container);
> > -        red_draw_drawable(display, now);
> > +        drawable_draw(display, now);
> >          display_channel_drawable_unref(display, now);
> >      } while (now != last);
> >      validate_area(display, area, surface_id);
> > --
> > 2.4.3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spice-devel mailing list
> > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
> 
> 
> Looks good, ACK!
> 
> --
> Fabiano Fidêncio
> 

Merged

Frediano
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]