Re: [PATCH 03/18] worker: remove cursor channel asserts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:39 -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > ---
> > >  server/cursor-channel.c | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/server/cursor-channel.c b/server/cursor-channel.c
> > > index aafc807..794dcf3 100644
> > > --- a/server/cursor-channel.c
> > > +++ b/server/cursor-channel.c
> > > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static void put_cursor_pipe_item(CursorChannelClient
> > > *ccc, CursorPipeItem *pipe_
> > >          return;
> > >      }
> > > 
> > > -    spice_assert(!pipe_item_is_linked(&pipe_item->base));
> > > +    spice_return_if_fail(!pipe_item_is_linked(&pipe_item->base));
> > > 
> > >      cursor_item_unref(pipe_item->cursor_item);
> > >      free(pipe_item);
> > > @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static void red_marshall_cursor_init(RedChannelClient
> > > *rcc, SpiceMarshaller *bas
> > >      SpiceMsgCursorInit msg;
> > >      AddBufInfo info;
> > > 
> > > -    spice_assert(rcc);
> > > +    spice_return_if_fail(rcc);
> > >      cursor_channel = SPICE_CONTAINEROF(rcc->channel, CursorChannel,
> > >      common.base);
> > > 
> > >      red_channel_client_init_send_data(rcc, SPICE_MSG_CURSOR_INIT, NULL);
> > > @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void
> > > cursor_channel_release_item(RedChannelClient *rcc, PipeItem *item, i
> > >  {
> > >      CursorChannelClient *ccc = RCC_TO_CCC(rcc);
> > > 
> > > -    spice_assert(item);
> > > +    spice_return_if_fail(item);
> > > 
> > >      if (item_pushed) {
> > >          cursor_channel_client_release_item_after_push(ccc, item);
> > > --
> > > 2.4.3
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spice-devel mailing list
> > > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
> > 
> > Seems okay, ACK!
> > 
> 
> I personally would NACK all these. Reasons:
> - there is no rationale whatsoever;
> - with default setting the change does nothing;
> - actually these assert does not happen so I don't see the point
>   of changing them without being able to cause the issue.
> 
> Frediano

I agree with the NACK

Pavel

> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]