On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 01:34:50PM -0600, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 12:25 -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >
> > > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > server/cursor-channel.c | 6 +++---
> > > > server/red_worker.c | 2 --
> > > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/server/cursor-channel.c b/server/cursor-channel.c
> > > > index 6d648b1..fc3a057 100644
> > > > --- a/server/cursor-channel.c
> > > > +++ b/server/cursor-channel.c
> > > > @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void
> > > > put_cursor_pipe_item(CursorChannelClient
> > > > *ccc, CursorPipeItem *pipe_
> > > > return;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - spice_assert(!pipe_item_is_linked(&pipe_item->base));
> > > > + spice_return_if_fail(!pipe_item_is_linked(&pipe_item
> > > > ->base));
> > > >
> > > > cursor_item_unref(pipe_item->cursor_item);
> > > > free(pipe_item);
> > > > @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static void
> > > > red_marshall_cursor_init(RedChannelClient
> > > > *rcc, SpiceMarshaller *bas
> > > > SpiceMsgCursorInit msg;
> > > > AddBufInfo info;
> > > >
> > > > - spice_assert(rcc);
> > > > + spice_return_if_fail(rcc);
> > > > cursor_channel = SPICE_CONTAINEROF(rcc->channel,
> > > > CursorChannel,
> > > > common.base);
> > > >
> > > > red_channel_client_init_send_data(rcc,
> > > > SPICE_MSG_CURSOR_INIT, NULL);
> > > > @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static void
> > > > cursor_channel_release_item(RedChannelClient
> > > > *rcc, PipeItem *item, i
> > > > {
> > > > CursorChannelClient *ccc = RCC_TO_CCC(rcc);
> > > >
> > > > - spice_assert(item);
> > > > + spice_return_if_fail(item);
> > > >
> > > > if (item_pushed) {
> > > > cursor_channel_client_release_item_after_push(ccc,
> > > > item);
> > >
> > > Considering the default behavior of spice_return_if_fail is
> > > aborting
> > > like spice_assert I don't see the point of these changes.
> >
> > The point is we should have less assert() in the code and be more
> > resilient to memory allocation failures or wrong arguments received
> > etc. Then the code should no longer assert() in return_if_fail().
>
>
> I'm becoming convinced that we should get rid of all of these spice_*
> equivalents to the glib logging / checking functions (spice_return_if,
> spice_warning, etc). The fact that spice_return_if_fail() aborts but
> g_return_if_fail() does not abort creates a potential for
> inconsistencies and incorrect usage.
I agree.
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/server/red_worker.c b/server/red_worker.c
> > > > index f70ee9b..10dfd8b 100644
> > > > --- a/server/red_worker.c
> > > > +++ b/server/red_worker.c
> > > > @@ -301,8 +301,6 @@ struct RedGlzDrawable {
> > > > pthread_mutex_t glz_dictionary_list_lock =
> > > > PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> > > > Ring glz_dictionary_list = {&glz_dictionary_list,
> > > > &glz_dictionary_list};
> > > >
> > > > -#define NUM_CURSORS 100
> > > > -
> > > > typedef struct RedWorker {
> > > > pthread_t thread;
> > > > clockid_t clockid;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.4.3
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'll split this last hunk in
> > >
> > > "worker: remove unused NUM_CURSORS define" (and I'll ack this)
> > >
> > > Frediano
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spice-devel mailing list
> > > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spice-devel mailing list
> > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel