Hey David, What is the best way of handling QXL kernel patches? Is it easier for you if they get reviewed first on spice-devel@? Or should we just ping you when patches have been pending for a bit too long? Thanks, Christophe On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:25:13PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > These two patches fixes two lock dependencies issues. > > Changes from v1: Sent a wrong patch. > > Frediano Ziglio (2): > drm/qxl: avoid buffer reservation in qxl_crtc_page_flip > drm/qxl: avoid dependency lock > > drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c | 10 +++++++++- > drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_release.c | 4 +--- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.4.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel