On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:14:27AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I'm not sure what you are suggesting by "features" here, but I'd prefer if we didn't introduce a chunk of XML which would contain an ever growing set of hacks. It seems sufficient for us to just record the libvirt version number which generated the XML document, so newer libvirt can detect a previous buggy version and correct what's needed, so the hacks are confined to the code and not spread across code + xml.
Seems reasonable. Moreover, the fixes can be handled in a way that back-porting doesn't cause problems as Laine was worried. I.e. the XML would be fixed twice.
Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel