On 5/12/15, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:08:40PM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote: >> On 5/11/15, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:26:20AM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote: >> >> > As this is a similar issue as your patch about the number of >> >> > channels, >> >> > can you double check that on your big endian builds, WORDS_BIGENDIAN >> >> > is >> >> > defined when generated_server_demarshallers.c is built? >> >> >> >> Oh, >> >> >> >> I'll double check that. >> > >> > Did you manage to get to the bottom of this in the end? >> > >> > Christophe >> > >> >> Oh, yes. It looks like that I had a partially worked version of the >> spice (that was not the upstream stuff, so I had missed something) > > But is this patch you sent needed or not? Nope, the patch is not needed. I'd be interested in > integrating the patches you have for better big-endian support, but > this particular one raised some questions about a potential deeper > problem, and I don't have easy access to test machines to dig further > into this. > So feel free to send any patches you have that are still needed for you. > > Thanks, > > Christophe > _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel