On 4/7/15, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 01:29:49PM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote: >> On 4/3/15, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:11:47PM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote: >> >> The rendering between ppc64 server and x86 client works super slow. >> >> Any hints where to look at? >> > >> > Not really no... Is the same VM over VNC slow or not? Is a VM with the >> > exactly the same configuration/QEMU command line running on an x86 >> > machine as slow? >> > >> > In the end, did you need many changes in order to get SPICE working on >> > that big-endian box? >> >> VNC works perfectly well. > > What about a VM with exactly the same configuration as the slow one > running on x86? I assume it's not slow? > >> No many. Mostly patches on initial connection setup. > > Ok, feel free to send them once you feel confident enough about them :) > >> What I see is a long delay before calling display_channel_send_item >> with PIPE_ITEM_TYPE_DRAW. >> >> I see also a lot of display_channel_release_item: not pushed(101) >> messages. > > Could be a hint, I guess there are more big-endia/little-endian bugs. Is > that with QXL or with standard VGA ? Standard VGA since looks like qemu needs some work on binding qxl on ppc emulated machines. Ok, I've figured out that the slow behavior was caused by missing kvm support :) Continuing investigating rendering freeze... > Christophe > -- Regards, Denis _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel