Hi ----- Original Message ----- > I think the gst PA elements are good enough. Since the change from > gst 0.10 to gst 1.0 I've been using gstreamer as default backend and > didn't notice any _new_ problems. But droping pulse entirely is a hard > decision as it affects other applications. > > The main difference at the moment to pulse is the volume per channel > which is not available in gststreamvolume and I didn't find a way to > workaround it. Bummer.. I wonder how gstreamer apps can provide audio balance then. audiopanorama? > Regarding the volume-sync what is most important is the last volume value > for the application and pulse elements get them from pulse itself so it > works fine IMHO. (i.e you disconnect the client and connect again, it > should have the same volume value as before) ok, so I guess with gst backend it will always have l=r volume. perhaps it's not such a showstopper, and we could tentatively deprecate the pulse backend. > So, if we are keeping pulse I could make it like gstreamer with PA > thread as I too think it the best alternative to work with this async > api. Ok _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel