Re: [spice-gtk RFC 0/3] coroutine: Make signal/notify coroutine code more robust against unexpected coroutine_init()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 01:44:43PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Nope, the coroutine was properly finished when I got the issue, but
> > there was still a queued signal/notify.
> 
> 
> Then there is a missing warning, because the coroutine should track
> it's own idle.

How does it track it? The idle id is only kept within
g_coroutine_signal_emit/g_coroutine_notify , the coroutine does not know
something is pending.

Christophe

Attachment: pgpFAAYHao4Tf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]