Re: [PATCH spice-gtk 1/9] channel: delay event report to after coroutine exit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

I think the shortlog is a bit misleading, it's only some specific events
which are reported this way. In particular, SPICE_CHANNEL_ERROR_LINK is
still reported as before.
Bit of context as to _why_ this change is needed would be nice.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 05:38:20PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Move to a common place error reporting, after the coroutine exits.


> ---
>  gtk/spice-channel-priv.h |  3 ++-
>  gtk/spice-channel.c      | 25 +++++++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gtk/spice-channel-priv.h b/gtk/spice-channel-priv.h
> index bd7f490..d70cf86 100644
> --- a/gtk/spice-channel-priv.h
> +++ b/gtk/spice-channel-priv.h
> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ struct _SpiceMsgIn {
>  
>  enum spice_channel_state {
>      SPICE_CHANNEL_STATE_UNCONNECTED = 0,
> -    SPICE_CHANNEL_STATE_FAILED_AUTHENTICATION,
>      SPICE_CHANNEL_STATE_RECONNECTING,
>      SPICE_CHANNEL_STATE_CONNECTING,
>      SPICE_CHANNEL_STATE_READY,
> @@ -110,6 +109,8 @@ struct _SpiceChannelPrivate {
>  
>      char                        name[16];
>      enum spice_channel_state    state;
> +    SpiceChannelEvent           event;
> +
>      spice_parse_channel_func_t  parser;
>      SpiceMessageMarshallers     *marshallers;
>      guint                       channel_watch;
> diff --git a/gtk/spice-channel.c b/gtk/spice-channel.c
> index 0301204..2f0ae1a 100644
> --- a/gtk/spice-channel.c
> +++ b/gtk/spice-channel.c
> @@ -2489,7 +2489,8 @@ cleanup:
>  
>      SPICE_CHANNEL_GET_CLASS(channel)->channel_disconnect(channel);
>  
> -    if (c->state == SPICE_CHANNEL_STATE_RECONNECTING) {
> +    if (c->event == SPICE_CHANNEL_NONE &&
> +        c->state == SPICE_CHANNEL_STATE_RECONNECTING) {
>          spice_channel_connect(channel);
>          g_object_unref(channel);
>      } else

Is this hunk strictly needed ? The code flow when the error was emitted
before exiting was not different, and I expect the old code needed to go
through there before the coroutine exited ?

Christophe

Attachment: pgpNwnRLLJy8t.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]