Hi, > > Great, thanks. And yeah, IE support is dicey at best. I think the > ideal is that we at least downgrade functionality gracefully, instead > of > failing. > > I have been playing with your patches, and they seem to work nicely. > I'll try to comment more formally on the v3 set. > > My remaining comments have less to do with your patches, than with > the > whole process. > > I have to confess I'm pretty ignorant of the whole file transfer > function. There are some ways it behaves that seem less than ideal. > There is no progress bar, I take it? I can add a progress bar element. > And do we really transmit in that small a chunk size? Well, I was unable to send bigger than 2kB - maybe it is websockify related problem. In spice-gtk we are sending 64KB and thanks to it the performance is much better. > And we preallocate the whole file before filling in the bytes? It is implemented in spice vdagent that way. > > I worry that the net result is going to be (and is currently) > potentially confusing. I drop a 4G file on my browser. Nothing > happens. > I drop it again. Now I've started a many hour process that's going > to run in the background. > I understand that it is confusing - maybe the progress bar can help? > > Also, on the file preallocation, I worry that I'll go look, think the > file is complete (because the size is right), and then copy off a > corrupt version... > > Do I understand correctly, or have I just horribly mis-configured my > agent? > You understand it correctly, I will add patches to solve issues. Best regards, Pavel _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel