Re: [PATCH spice 1/4] Split spice.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:41:34AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Mail original -----
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:54:04PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > Make it easier to read the Spice server API.
> > 
> > I never had the feeling spice.h was too big, but I'm not strongly
> > opposed to that either, so why not.
> 
> It's not about being too big, it's about readability (as I wrote).

Well, for spice.h, this goes together imo.

> 
> > > diff --git a/server/spice-version.h b/server/spice-version.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..b5c8eb0
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/server/spice-version.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + *  Copyright (C) 2009-2014 Red Hat, Inc.
> > > + *
> > > + *  This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > > + *  modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> > > + *  License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> > > + *  version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > > + *
> > > + *  This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > > + *  but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > > + *  MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> > > + *  Lesser General Public License for more details.
> > > + *
> > > + *  You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> > > + *  License along with this library; if not, see
> > > <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef SPICE_VERSION_H_
> > > +#define SPICE_VERSION_H_
> > > +
> > > +#if !defined(SPICE_H_INSIDE) && !defined(SPICE_SERVER_INTERNAL)
> > > +#error "Only spice.h can be included directly."
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#define SPICE_SERVER_VERSION 0x000c06 /* release 0.12.6 */
> > 
> > This bit does not match what is in git master.
> 
> See earlier patch "chardev: remove write polling"
> 
> Please try to review patches in order they are submitted, and by importance :)

I'm not going to keep track of order on patches which are submitted
separately and which can be independent.

Attachment: pgptzjNMIUkur.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]