----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:17:24PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > VD_AGENT_MONITORS_CONFIG messages can be processed if
> > red_dispatcher_use_client_monitors_config().
> >
> > A token must be returned to the client to keep sending agent messages.
> >
> > This solves reconfiguration of monitor with DRM/KMS device when the
>
> What is 'reconfiguration' of monitor?
auto-config? mutter to follow the preferred resolution?
>
> > agent is not running.
> > ---
> > server/agent-msg-filter.c | 13 +++++--------
> > server/reds.c | 5 +++--
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/server/agent-msg-filter.c b/server/agent-msg-filter.c
> > index 567e03d..f53fd9a 100644
> > --- a/server/agent-msg-filter.c
> > +++ b/server/agent-msg-filter.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,11 @@ data_to_read:
> > return AGENT_MSG_FILTER_PROTO_ERROR;
> > }
> >
> > - if (filter->discard_all) {
> > +
> > + if (msg_header.type == VD_AGENT_MONITORS_CONFIG &&
> > + red_dispatcher_use_client_monitors_config()) {
> > + filter->result = AGENT_MSG_FILTER_MONITORS_CONFIG;
> > + } else if (filter->discard_all) {
>
> discard_all becomes discard_almost_all after this change, but is still
> called discard_all, this makes things even less obvious than they already
> are :(
Yeah, I am not sure we want to go this way either. It was perhaps not such a good idea to reuse existing agent messages, when they have a different control flow than the rest of main channel messages.
I'd keep this aside for now..
> Christophe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel