On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:32:45PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/18/2013 02:21 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:28:28AM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > >> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> --- configure.ac | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 > >> deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 22e3889..7aa734e > >> 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ > >> AC_PREREQ([2.57]) # 4. Follow the libtool manual for the so > >> version: # > >> http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Updating-version-info.html > >> > >> -m4_define([SPICE_CURRENT], [9]) +m4_define([SPICE_CURRENT], > >> [10]) m4_define([SPICE_REVISION], [0]) -m4_define([SPICE_AGE], > >> [8]) +m4_define([SPICE_AGE], [0]) > > > > I'd rather we avoid breaking ABI 'just' for the NBD channel. > > What do you think is the correct criteria? My criteria would be to never break it, so not really useful. I'd tend to return the question, if we break the ABI now (which hasn't been done in recent times), where do we stop? Some stuff in the Opus patches could also be made easier by breaking ABI, should we break ABI a second time there? Christophe
Attachment:
pgpcBuNY8EmC3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel