Re: [PATCH 4/9] build-sys: bump current, as ABI is going to be broken next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:28:28AM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>>  configure.ac | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>> index 22e3889..7aa734e 100644
>> --- a/configure.ac
>> +++ b/configure.ac
>> @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ AC_PREREQ([2.57])
>>  # 4. Follow the libtool manual for the so version:
>>  #  http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Updating-version-info.html
>>
>> -m4_define([SPICE_CURRENT], [9])
>> +m4_define([SPICE_CURRENT], [10])
>>  m4_define([SPICE_REVISION], [0])
>> -m4_define([SPICE_AGE], [8])
>> +m4_define([SPICE_AGE], [0])
>
> I'd rather we avoid breaking ABI 'just' for the NBD channel.

It's not NBD per se, but the mainloop interface change needed by qemu
to handle migration with a Spice NBD.

In theory, it would be possible to modify qemu to not require those
changes, but that would probably have even less chances to be
accepted. But I am open for suggestions, it's still RFC all over ;)

-- 
Marc-André Lureau
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]