On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:53:55AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Why? Using SASL without username is a bit limited - or do I miss something? > > Current SASL implementation in Spice doesn't support username. > > > And you can still use tickets if you check for strlen(username) == 0 ? > > There is noneed to ask the user a username for the current methods. He > wouldn't do what to put there. I don't think mandating that the username we use for SASL is the unix user name the client runs as makes a lot of sense. Imo it would be better if we always asked for username/password when SASL asks for it, and prefill the username field with the local unix user name. For what it's worth, when using vnc+sasl, we get asked for a username when using digest-md5. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpL50J5qR4yr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel