> I think you should keep the UP flag there you had in your previous proposal (to
> avoid problems of network latency, generating spurious key repeatition events
> on application/guest side)
OK
> Why not have SUPER (win key), HYPER and META?
Sure, I can add them
>
> > +typedef struct SPICE_ATTR_PACKED VDAgentKeyval {
> > + uint32_t keyval;
> > + uint32_t flags;
> > +} VDAgentKeyval;
> > +
> > typedef struct SPICE_ATTR_PACKED VDAgentReply {
> > uint32_t type;
> > uint32_t error;
> > @@ -209,6 +225,7 @@
> > VD_AGENT_CAP_SPARSE_MONITORS_CONFIG,
> > VD_AGENT_CAP_GUEST_LINEEND_LF,
> > VD_AGENT_CAP_GUEST_LINEEND_CRLF,
> > + VD_AGENT_CAP_KEYVAL,
> > VD_AGENT_END_CAP,
> > };
> >
>
>
> As discussed in summary mail, I think this key event should be on input channel,
> to avoid key/mouse event synchronization issues on two channels and because
> it is a substitute (not a complement) to existing KeyDown/KeyUp messages.
OK, will rewrite.
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel