Hi,
On 04/11/2013 12:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 04/10/2013 05:07 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Only one remark, do we really want to prefix all the tools with "spicy",
wouldn't just "spice" as prefix be better ?
I just opted for something uniform, so all binaries installed by spice-gtk will have spicy prefix Having different name can make it harder to find in which package it belongs. I have no strong feeling, I wished nobody would really care, since it's an obscure tool.
I understand that you want something uniform, but personally
I like spice-foo better. So I would like to propose to rename
spicy-stats to spice-stats, and name the screenshot tool
spice-screenshot.
As for spicy itself, leave it as is, but maybe no longer install
it on a make install, since it really is for testing only?
Anyways not really a big deal, just a slight preference to
get rid of the spicy- prefix in favor of spice- before we've
even more spicy utils and renaming becomes painful.
I see you've rolled 0.19 already, so I guess this argument
is mute. Ah well spicy-foo it is from now on.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel