Re: Fixing the spice-gtk version scheme mess

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

----- Mensaje original -----
> > If we want a new release, let's just do 0.16
> 
> This is what we've been doing so far, and *it is not working*
> 
> We keep on packaging git snapshots in Fedora and RHEL left and
> right, showiing this scheme is broken.

Please explain what is broken. Btw, we do have release + patches in RHEL. And in Fedora, when we can't take a git snapshot (or when someone want to update with patches). If the tarball + patches is the same as git, we can take a git snapshot. No?

> AFAIK we try to follow gnome / gtk / glib in how we deal
> with most things. All of these have bugfix releases,
> so has the kernel, so has spice[-server], and almost
> any other free software project under the sun!

No, spice-gtk doesn't follow gnome release cycle, version scheme etc. I really try to keep git as stable as possible so we can release at any time. Bug or regressions can always occur no matter how you do. Then a new release is needed.

> Please stop stubbornly pushing your own versioning scheme,
> AFAIK others have had this same discussion with you already
> and told you we need bug fix releases.

I still fail to see what problem we have by making releases this way.

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]