> There was already one time when code was commited and reverted later because of misunderstanding on the way the code should be organized, last time it was coding standard (which to be honest Soren has made clear twice already that he follows pixman's coding style for xf86-video-qxl), so I agree it is a bad way to go forward. Perhaps you can address Soren's concerns one to one (I admit I don't remember them exactly without looking at the back log, but you'd need to address Soren directly to proceed without invoking the long-enough rule anyway). Ah; I was unaware of the pixman coding convention; that is good to know. I believe I'm unable to edit this page: http://spice-space.org/developers.html but it might be good to put a note there. I believe I did address Soren's concerns directly in the original thread: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2012-September/010884.html about a month ago. This new thread is an attempt to resurrect the issue, and to understand how best to go about resolving non obvious issues. Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel