> That said, you both agree about keeping that warning and going out of our > way to please xorg, so I'm fine with any patches you agree on ;) Sure; two of us agree. However, Søren has raised concerns, and has not yet further commented. And Søren clearly deserves a substantial voice in what happens to this code. But I feel that I have asked politely, and have waited a polite amount of time, so it's reasonable for me to agitate for resolution. I get the sense that this happens with this project, and with Søren in particular; he seems to be particularly slammed for time, and that there seems to be a 'oh well, we waited long enough, let's just commit it anyway' attitude. I do have commit access, so I can just commit. But I'd appreciate some explicit guidance - is there some time period that is agreed to be reasonable to wait for further response? Have I met that yet? (I've mentally assigned '1 month' as being said reasonable window, and it's been a month since I first raised this issue). Do we just prefer to go ahead and commit and revert if and when we later disagree? That approach seems like a recipe for disaster to me... Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel