Re: [spice-gtk PATCH 1/7] channel-base: remove bad check of SpiceMsgWaitForChannels validity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Yonit Halperin <yhalperi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> SpiceMsgWaitForChannels is not packed. Comparing the original
> msg size to SpiceMsgWaitForChannels is wrong.
> ---
>  gtk/channel-base.c |    3 ---
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gtk/channel-base.c b/gtk/channel-base.c
> index cc4d242..2968f42 100644
> --- a/gtk/channel-base.c
> +++ b/gtk/channel-base.c
> @@ -120,9 +120,6 @@ void spice_channel_handle_wait_for_channels(SpiceChannel *channel, SpiceMsgIn *i
>      SpiceMsgWaitForChannels *wfc = spice_msg_in_parsed(in);
>      int i;
>
> -    g_return_if_fail(spice_header_get_msg_size(in->header, channel->priv->use_mini_header) >=
> -                     sizeof(*wfc) + wfc->wait_count * sizeof(wfc->wait_list[0]));
> -

I think I got your point, but it would be even better if you had a
stacktrace or a case where this check is actually invalid. Imho, >=
should still be true, even if the packing is different.


-- 
Marc-André Lureau
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]