Hi, I tried to look into the code to see how these RFEs could be implemented: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787185 (qemu-kvm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834513 (spice-gtk) and I found that the channel names are actually defined in spice-server code: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice/tree/server/reds.c#n3959 That's fine for qemu-kvm because it includes spice.h of spice server, but spice-gtk includes just stuff from spice-protocol. What is lesser pain to do, move the channel names to spice-protocol and add the spice-protocol includes to qemu code or to include spice-server heades in spice-gtk too. It seems to me that it the most logical is to move the channel names to spice-protocol to keep them near the channel codes that are defined here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-protocol/tree/spice/enums.h#n337 but I don't really understand the problem enough so I'l like to hear more opinions. David -- David Jaša, RHCE SPICE QE based in Brno GPG Key: 22C33E24 Fingerprint: 513A 060B D1B4 2A72 7F0D 0278 B125 CD00 22C3 3E24 _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel