Re: [PATCH 2/2] Release 0.11.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:01:54PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
> But I thought it doesn't break existing users. If it does that's not
> what I meant. I thought the important name was that before the .so, i.e.
> libspice-server, and that the dynamic linker will look for .1 and then
> if none found will use anything newer.

Nope, it will look for an exact match for libspice-server.so.N, so
if a binary was built against libspice-server.so.1, the binary won't run
with anything different. If a library is ABI compatible with an older
version but has newer interfaces, the soname must not change for older
binaries to keep using it.

Christophe

Attachment: pgpbsSkOj2eVC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]