On 12.06.2012 12:48, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 15:46 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > >> I plan to use this patch in the upcoming Debian >> release, codename wheezy, to get rid of celt >> codec library there, since we decided celt051 is >> not going to be included, but it is obviously not >> a good idea to drop spice entirely. > > Isn't it better to drop spice completely rather than shipping a version > thats essentially protocol incompatible? (Well, it will fall back to no > audio or non-compressed audio, but that is untested and pretty bad for > actual use of spice.) It isn't incompatible. It might be incompatible with older releases of spice where audio codec negotiation/fallback were not properly implemented (read: was buggy), but it is okay now. Did you read the whole my email where I mention testing I performed? > Then users that want to use spice can get a working version somewhere > else instead of just thinking that spice sucks because of this change. Thanks, /mjt _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel