On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 03:35:00PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Alon Levy <alevy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > --- > > NEWS | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > configure.ac | 4 ++-- > > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Looks good to me, although I wonder why we never bump > SPICE_LT_VERSION. In theory we should > http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Updating-version-info.html. > Perhaps we should bump to 1, 0, 3. I agree that we need to change it, but I find that page very confusing. According to point 2 at the bottom, since we are backward compatible but added interfaces, we should increment both ''current'' and ''age'', i.e. 2.0.3 According to the set of rules (bullets 1-6) at the top, we should increment ''revision'' (per point 3, since the source code changed) and increment ''age'' per rule 5, i.e. 1.1.3 If I take the intersection of those two I get what you proposed (which makes sense, but I can't reach it following that page..) > > -- > Marc-André Lureau _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel