Re: [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: Add support for SPARC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: Add support for SPARC
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 09:32:41 +0100
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Larsson <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Torek <chris.torek@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250322-nolibc-sparc-v2-1-89af018c6296@weissschuh.net>
References: <20250322-nolibc-sparc-v2-1-89af018c6296@weissschuh.net>

On 2025-03-22 09:10:51 [+0100], Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # UltraSparc T4 (Niagara4)
> ---
> This is only tested on QEMU.
> Any tests on real hardware would be very welcome.

I did test on real hardware.

Sebastian

References:
- [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: Add support for SPARC
  - From: Thomas Weißschuh

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: Add support for SPARC
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] stack_tracer: move sysctl registration to kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: Add support for SPARC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [DCCP] [Linux ARM Development] [Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite Help] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [Linux x86_64] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux