David! On Sun, Nov 03 2024 at 16:05, David Wang wrote: $Subject: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc: performance: ... That's not a valid subsystem prefix. > seq_printf is costy, when stress reading /proc/interrupts, profiling indicates > seq_printf takes about ~47% of show_interrupts samples: Also please follow the documentation for denoting functions in change logs: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#function-references-in-changelogs > arch/alpha/kernel/irq.c | 8 +-- > arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 4 +- > arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 3 +- > arch/csky/kernel/smp.c | 4 +- > arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c | 2 +- > arch/parisc/kernel/irq.c | 34 ++++++------ > arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 44 ++++++++-------- > arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c | 3 +- > arch/sh/kernel/irq.c | 4 +- > arch/sparc/kernel/irq_32.c | 12 ++--- > arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c | 4 +- > arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ > arch/xtensa/kernel/irq.c | 2 +- > arch/xtensa/kernel/smp.c | 4 +- > kernel/irq/proc.c | 6 ++- There is no dependency on these changes. So please split them up into seperate patches for core and the individual architectures. Thanks, tglx
