Re: clearly mark DMA_OPS support as an architecture feasture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 2:30 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 02:27:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Actually I meant, we can extend the virtio_config_ops to allow mapping
> > ops there, then simulator and VDUSE can hook the map ops there.
>
> From a quick glance that feels like the right layer of abstraction,
> although the config part of the name feels wrong at that point.

Right, or we could have a dedicated map_ops instead of trying to use
virtio_config_ops.

Thanks

>






[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux