On Sun, Aug 04 2024 at 17:30, Koakuma wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Why does this sparc'ism need to be in generic code?
>
> Doesn't x86 also have a couple functions that live in math64.h anyway?
No. Both functions are used in the generic lib/vdso/ code.
> That's why I thought it is fine to put it in there...
>
> In any case, though, I am open to moving the function to sparc directory,
> if that is indeed the proper place for that function.
I think so as sparc is having it's own VDSO implementation and does not
use the generic one.
Thanks,
tglx
