Re: [PATCH v4 00/40] lib/find: add atomic find_bit() primitives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 11:32, Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Is that in master already? I didn't get any email, and I can't find
> > anything related in the master branch.
> 
> It's 5d272dd1b343 ("cpumask: limit FORCE_NR_CPUS to just the UP case").

FORCE_NR_CPUS helped to generate a better code for me back then. I'll
check again against the current kernel.

The 5d272dd1b343 is wrong. Limiting FORCE_NR_CPUS to UP case makes no
sense because in UP case nr_cpu_ids is already a compile-time macro:

#if (NR_CPUS == 1) || defined(CONFIG_FORCE_NR_CPUS)
#define nr_cpu_ids ((unsigned int)NR_CPUS)
#else
extern unsigned int nr_cpu_ids;
#endif

I use FORCE_NR_CPUS for my Rpi. (used, until I burnt it)

> > > New rule: before you send some optimization, you need to have NUMBERS.
> >
> > I tried to underline that it's not a performance optimization at my
> > best.
> 
> If it's not about performance, then it damn well shouldn't be 90%
> inline functions in a header file.
> 
> If it's a helper function, it needs to be a real function elsewhere. Not this:
> 
>  include/linux/find_atomic.h                  | 324 +++++++++++++++++++
> 
> because either performance really matters, in which case you need to
> show profiles, or performance doesn't matter, in which case it damn
> well shouldn't have special cases for small bitsets that double the
> size of the code.

This small_const_nbits() thing is a compile-time optimization for a
single-word bitmap with a compile-time length.

If the bitmap is longer, or nbits is not known at compile time, the
inline part goes away entirely at compile time.

In the other case, outline part goes away. So those converting from
find_bit() + test_and_set_bit() will see no new outline function
calls.

This inline + outline implementation is traditional for bitmaps, and
for some people it's important. For example, Sean Christopherson
explicitly asked to add a notice that converting to the new API will
still generate inline code. See patch #13.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux