Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.10-rc3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andreas,

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 09:28:25AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > JFYI, when comparing v6.10-rc3[1] to v6.10-rc2[3], the summaries are:
> >  - build errors: +6/-1
> 
>   + error: arch/sparc/kernel/process_32.o: relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP22 against `.text':  => (.fixup+0x4), (.fixup+0xc)
>   + error: arch/sparc/kernel/signal_32.o: relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP22 against `.text':  => (.fixup+0x34), (.fixup+0x10), (.fixup+0x0), (.fixup+0x28), (.fixup+0x4), (.fixup+0x18), (.fixup+0x20), (.fixup+0x1c), (.fixup+0x8)
>   + error: relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP22 against `.init.text':  => (.head.text+0x5040), (.head.text+0x5100)
>   + error: relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP22 against symbol `leon_smp_cpu_startup' defined in .text section in arch/sparc/kernel/trampoline_32.o:  => (.init.text+0xa4)

Did you have something in a local branch that would address this?
I have no idea how to fix it.
> 
> sparc64-gcc5/sparc-allmodconfig
> sparc64-gcc13/sparc-allmodconfig
> 
>   + {standard input}: Error: pcrel too far: 1095, 1074, 1022, 1020, 1021, 1096, 1126 => 1074, 1021, 1255, 1096, 1095, 1020, 1022, 1126, 1254
>   + {standard input}: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.al':  => 1270
Hmm, strange..

	Sam




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux