Hi David,
On 22/01/2024 20:41, David Hildenbrand wrote:
We want to make use of pte_next_pfn() outside of set_ptes(). Let's
simpliy define PFN_PTE_SHIFT, required by pte_next_pfn().
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 0c94260b5d0c1..add5cd30ab34d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -523,6 +523,8 @@ static inline void __set_pte_at(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval)
set_pte(ptep, pteval);
}
+#define PFN_PTE_SHIFT _PAGE_PFN_SHIFT
+
static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval, unsigned int nr)
{
There is a typo in the commit title: risc -> riscv. Otherwise, this is
right so:
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Alex
